Is Twitter Telegram 3.0?

by Beverly Macy on January 14, 2009


“URGENT STOP New romantics discovered STOP Send poetry and drawings STOP Survival depends on it STOP Gratefully END D. H. Lawrence”

I was composing a Tweet the other day, struggling to squeeze my message into 140 characters, and I started thinking about the evolution of how we are communicating in the global, social economy world today. As an educator and strategic advisor, I often take a step back to think about the trends, patterns, history we are enacting and how they play out in our everyday business and personal lives.

It suddenly hit me: Twitter (and text messaging, for that matter) is the evolution of the telegram 200+ plus years later. The instructions on the telegram, “Message goes here. Be brief.” That seems familiar: be brief, 140 characters, you get the connection.  According to Retro-Gram, back when telegrams started,  if  simple poetic brevity wasn’t good enough, some people resorted to the use of code to make their telegrams as short — and as cheap — as possible.  As early as 1845, independent entrepreneurs published books of codes for use in telegrams.  You can see it in old black and white movies: “Just arrived in Paris. STOP. Wish you were here. STOP”

Someone mentioned recently that Twitter was the Hotmail of this decade, in terms of creating a new paradigm, and I do agree with that. It’s easy to forget that Hotmail was revolutionary at the time.  Up until then, our email was company- or ISP-based (remember “You’ve Got Mail”), and Hotmail set us free in terms of customizing communications channels to suit our personal and professional needs. The Hotmail web-based email service was founded by Jack Smith and Sabeer Bhatia and launched in July of 1996.  Hard to believe it was a mere 13 years ago.

But the struggling with 140-character format is what prompted me to go back even further. I remember my Grandfather was a Lt. Col. in the Army and in a scrapbook had saved copies of important telegrams from WWII when he commanded troops in Greece. Before long-distance telephone services were readily available or affordable, telegram services were very popular.  Telegrams were often used to confirm business dealings and, unlike email, telegrams were commonly used to create binding legal documents for business dealings. The height of the telegram age was probably the 1920s and ‘30s, when Western Union maintained a fleet of 14,000 uniformed messenger boys, on foot and on bicycle, and many thousands more of operators, clerks, and copyists.  Then came the famous Singing Telegram, popularized by Western Union.

Telegraph Telecom Definition

1. An apparatus or process for communicating information over a distance by coded signals. Simple telegraphs employ smoke signals, drums, mirrors, flags, fires, lanterns, and mechanical semaphores. 2. The electric telegraph was invented by Samuel F.B. Morse (1791)

In 1998 Tom Standage wrote a book called The Victorian Internet which explores the historical development of the telegraph and the social ramifications associated with the development of this technology. He says that the development of the telegraph essentially mirrored the development of the Internet. Both technologies can be seen to have largely impacted the speed and transmission of information.

Fast forward to Twitter 2009 and we are composing and transmitting thousands of “written messages destined for far off places”, thousands of times a day.  It’s a wonderful world, indeed.

Beverly Macy is the Managing Partner of Y&M Partners and teaches a social media class at UCLA. Y&M just launched the “Pay it Forward 2009” project.

Bookmark and Share

{ 4 trackbacks }

Eu que adoro relações retrô-tecnológicas… « Bricolagem High Tech
January 14, 2009 at 4:00 pm
16 Twitter Analogies To Help You Explain Twitter - Blog by Jon Bishop
June 10, 2009 at 11:13 am
16 Twitter Analogies To Help You Explain Twitter
August 4, 2009 at 11:46 am
16 analogias para explicar o que é Twitter! « Parl@!web
October 13, 2009 at 12:48 pm

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Don Carli January 14, 2009 at 9:38 am

Interesting thesis…. but differences outnumber similarities.

Troy January 14, 2009 at 2:06 pm

Yes, I agree the differences outnumber the similarities, but the similarities are significant.

Brevity causes clarity.

The key difference is barrier to entry, it’s easy to send 100 tweets not so much with telegrams. That said the style of communication is important. Often we need to look back in order to look forward, experts don’t predict the future, they look at the past see what patterns are happening now.

I think the “Twitter as telegram” is very steampunk and bears a closer look.

Troy
http://www.nibipedia.com

Debra Askanase January 14, 2009 at 3:22 pm

Bevery,
Very thoughtful post, and intriguing to consider. Due to its brevity, it is easy to make the analogy between the telegram and Twitter. However, I feel that Twitter is all about the
1. conversation and
2. relationships

Thus, I think the analogy is closer to the postal letter of the 19th century, but updated for ease of use.
Debra
http://www.communityorganizer20.wordpress.com

molly steenson January 19, 2009 at 12:43 pm

I’ve been doing a lot of research (for an eventual dissertation) on the pneumatic postal service in Paris — it was an auxiliary service to the telegraph that delivered handwritten messages through the dense urban center of Paris. Many cities had then in the second half of the 19th century and first half of the 20th century.

More here:http://www.activesocialplastic.com/2009/01/pneumatic_post_in_paris.html
and here:
http://www.activesocialplastic.com/2008/12/postal_services_and_pneumatic.html

Beverly Macy January 20, 2009 at 9:37 pm

Molly, Your project sounds so interesting, I’d love to connect. I’m on Twitter @beverlymacy

Øyvind Graham February 5, 2009 at 11:32 am

Hi!
Interesting parallels drawn here..
I thinkk the common factor are the messages,
but the stages in messaging evoultion had very different effects:

the clacks-telegraph – or the visual telegraph freed the message from transport of paper. it could be sent through sight of eye..

The electrical telegraph freed the message from its arrivaltime, and cut the cost 30-fold ( wikipedia/telegraphy). Messaging became mainstream.

The telephone freed the message from the written word alltogether.

Email freed the message of any variable costs.

Twitter maybe freed the message from its wrapping – its just a stream of short more or less meaningful messages, with little wrappings.

Telegrams may still have a meaning today – in that the operator of the telegramservice can offer verification of the sender. This is something only expert email-users can handle today.

This, along with simplicity of use, and the nostalgia is why telegraf.no offers norwegian customers to send telegrams from the internet, verified by SMS and mobilephone.

Kind regards
a modern telegraphist.. ; )

Rob May 29, 2009 at 7:11 am

My company does still send telegrams these days. We use them for debt collection. That would be a bit hard to do via Twitter though….:)

Anyway, people do respond muuuuch better to our telegrams than to our regular debt letters, so a telegram is still something special apparantly.

We use the telegram service of http://www.telegramsonline.co.uk, but there are many others as well.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: