<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skittles.com All Our Base are Belong to You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/</link>
	<description>Micro sharing. Macro results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Chan</title>
		<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-26717</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistachioconsulting.com/?p=2849#comment-26717</guid>
		<description>Laura, 

I used the same All your base reference but your version is one better! Seems the debate is around content vs attention. A lot of folks think the content posted debases the brand; others think all press is good press and that skittles was indeed an impactful campaign. 

do folks here think this was a one-off, or something that other brands could embrace? would the twitterverse stay polite in future variations on this theme?

http://www.gravity7.com/blog/media/2009/03/i-want-candy-skittles-embraces-twitter.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura, </p>
<p>I used the same All your base reference but your version is one better! Seems the debate is around content vs attention. A lot of folks think the content posted debases the brand; others think all press is good press and that skittles was indeed an impactful campaign. </p>
<p>do folks here think this was a one-off, or something that other brands could embrace? would the twitterverse stay polite in future variations on this theme?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gravity7.com/blog/media/2009/03/i-want-candy-skittles-embraces-twitter.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gravity7.com/blog/media/2009/03/i-want-candy-skittles-embraces-twitter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clerkendweller</title>
		<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-26703</link>
		<dc:creator>Clerkendweller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistachioconsulting.com/?p=2849#comment-26703</guid>
		<description>Some comments on the security aspects (and a link to this page) at:

http://www.clerkendweller.com/2009/3/3/In-the-Dark-with-Skittles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments on the security aspects (and a link to this page) at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clerkendweller.com/2009/3/3/In-the-Dark-with-Skittles" rel="nofollow">http://www.clerkendweller.com/2009/3/3/In-the-Dark-with-Skittles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Hilton</title>
		<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-26674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistachioconsulting.com/?p=2849#comment-26674</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested to see if this a multi-part campaign? Because quite frankly, it&#039;s a novelty that as Rex Hammock put it, &quot;has a short half-life&quot;. Once the twittersphere moves on to the next trend, and without a &quot;next phase&quot; from Skittles, does skittles.com become a ghost town?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested to see if this a multi-part campaign? Because quite frankly, it&#8217;s a novelty that as Rex Hammock put it, &#8220;has a short half-life&#8221;. Once the twittersphere moves on to the next trend, and without a &#8220;next phase&#8221; from Skittles, does skittles.com become a ghost town?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Corbett</title>
		<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-26635</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistachioconsulting.com/?p=2849#comment-26635</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of the &#039;bad kids&#039; I think and had to bomb that feed with the word F*CK....just to test and see if there was a filter: http://twitpic.com/1srl8 

Thankfully there are almost no kids on Twitter anyway, so I don&#039;t feel so bad:

http://www.istrategylabs.com/twitter-2009-demographics-and-statistics/

See you at SXSW!

P
&lt;em&gt;from LJF: i edited this to replace that U with an *&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of the &#8216;bad kids&#8217; I think and had to bomb that feed with the word F*CK&#8230;.just to test and see if there was a filter: <a href="http://twitpic.com/1srl8" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/1srl8</a> </p>
<p>Thankfully there are almost no kids on Twitter anyway, so I don&#8217;t feel so bad:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.istrategylabs.com/twitter-2009-demographics-and-statistics/" rel="nofollow">http://www.istrategylabs.com/twitter-2009-demographics-and-statistics/</a></p>
<p>See you at SXSW!</p>
<p>P<br />
<em>from LJF: i edited this to replace that U with an *</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suki Fuller</title>
		<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-26634</link>
		<dc:creator>Suki Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistachioconsulting.com/?p=2849#comment-26634</guid>
		<description>Not the wisest move. Filter is needed...kids wanting to learn about the product shall come across that page...and sometimes people just want facts from a company not the opinions and perceptions of other consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the wisest move. Filter is needed&#8230;kids wanting to learn about the product shall come across that page&#8230;and sometimes people just want facts from a company not the opinions and perceptions of other consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Otis</title>
		<link>http://pistachioconsulting.com/skittlescom-all-our-base-are-belong-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-26630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistachioconsulting.com/?p=2849#comment-26630</guid>
		<description>Not sure what I think about this, Laura.  It seems social democracy takes a front seat over the company&#039;s own voice. I know social media is power of the people, but where is the consistency with brand messaging nowadays? It&#039;s like the telephone game round and round... and the company&#039;s not even on the line. 

Hopefully they do some back-and-forth and don&#039;t completely let it be.  Thanks for your insights on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what I think about this, Laura.  It seems social democracy takes a front seat over the company&#8217;s own voice. I know social media is power of the people, but where is the consistency with brand messaging nowadays? It&#8217;s like the telephone game round and round&#8230; and the company&#8217;s not even on the line. </p>
<p>Hopefully they do some back-and-forth and don&#8217;t completely let it be.  Thanks for your insights on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
